![]() ![]() ![]() Lines backed up in some areas amid the confusion. The defective printers produced ballots that were too light to be read by the on-site tabulators at polling places. Opposing attorneys said the workers’ speculation doesn’t amount to a violation of the law or misconduct by election workers, and raised questions about whether the three workers truly knew the ultimate outcome of the ballots they had flagged.Ībha Khanna, one of the attorneys representing Hobbs, said Lake’s allegations are “wholly untethered to reality.”Įarlier in her lawsuit, Lake had focused on problems with ballot printers at some polling places in Maricopa County. “The math doesn’t add up,” said Kurt Olsen, one of Lake’s attorneys. Three signature verification workers have said they experienced rejection rates due to mismatched signatures on 15% to 40% of the ballots they encountered. Lake alleged at least 164,000 illegal votes were counted, according to filings by her attorneys. The state Supreme Court sent the claim back to the lower court to decide if there is another reason to dismiss it, or if Lake can show that enough votes were affected to change the outcome of the election, which she lost by over 17,000 votes. The Arizona Supreme Court revived her claim challenging the application of signature-verification procedures, reversing a lower court decision that found she waited too long to raise that claim. Her attorneys say the county ultimately accepted thousands of ballots that had been rejected earlier by workers for having mismatched signatures. Lake’s lawyers say there was a flood of mail-in ballots in Maricopa County, home to more than 60% of the state’s voters, at a time when there were too few workers to verify ballot signatures. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |